a few months ago, whilst i was struggling for artistic inspiration, a friend requested a drawing.
she said, “draw me a bisected head with a foetus for a brain.”
[pencil+ink on paper. 29 april 2011]
it seemed like such an obvious idea – that there may be foetus/baby inside your skull, rather than a brain. it was a concept my friend, rach, had been thinking about for some time, but had never realised it in any medium. when i sketched it for her, a detail i included was that the umbilical cord was attached to the brain stem. a technicality she had always imagined, but hadn’t mentioned to me.
please, take a moment and think about this idea:
“a foetus in place of a brain.”
there are so many directions my mind spins off at this point: co-joined twins/ birth lineage/ reproduction/ evolution/ parasites /the unconscious mind/ the inner-child…
- i mean, could this be some kind of foetal abnormality or mutation?
- or maybe this is a new birthing process evolution has in-store to tackle population control: a strict one-in one-out policy?
- and if we have babies for brains, what will the zombies eat?
- did the brain change into a baby, or has it always been there – piloting the body that it is housed inside?
- what if does the foetus have another foetus INSIDE it’s own skull? foetus fractals!
it was once believed that semen transmitted the soul into a new life. this drawing by da vinci [circa 1487] demonstrates this was accomplished by a thin tube connecting the brain to the penis, via the spinal cord.
i struggle to understand whether my interest in this idea of a brainchild is based on anatomical/medical interest, as some kind of carnival sideshow attraction, or if it is rooted much deeper within the psyche as this archaic connection between the brain and new life may suggest.